From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:39:16 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: Make CONFIG_SPL_BUILD contain more functionality In-Reply-To: (from B40530@freescale.com on Fri May 17 10:04:12 2013) References: <1368781939-15750-1-git-send-email-ying.zhang@freescale.com> <20130517123425.GO32163@bill-the-cat> <20130517142040.GQ32163@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <1368808756.8202.53@snotra> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 05/17/2013 10:04:12 AM, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote: > > ________________________________________ > From: Tom Rini [tom.rini at gmail.com] on behalf of Tom Rini > [trini at ti.com] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:54 PM > To: Zhang Ying-B40530 > Cc: Xie at theia.denx.de; u-boot at lists.denx.de; afleming at gmail.com; > Wood at theia.denx.de; Wood Scott-B07421 > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: Make CONFIG_SPL_BUILD contain > more functionality > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:26:04PM +0000, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote: > > [Zhang Ying] > > So for this patch, are there any problem? > > > > Yes. It doesn't seem to do anything. Which is why I want to see the > series of patches that result in new functionality on some boards, so > we > can evaluate the changes in context. > [Zhang Ying] > It seems to be several patches were sent together. No, they weren't. They were sent separately. Use git format-patch to generate all the patches at once, so they're numbered, and use git send-email to send them all at once, so they're threaded properly. -Scott