From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mpc85xx: remove the unneeded pci init functions for corenet ds board
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:54:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369940099.14679.14@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130530102034.GB18702@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com> (from haokexin@gmail.com on Thu May 30 05:20:34 2013)
On 05/30/2013 05:20:34 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:52:09PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 05/21/2013 07:04:58 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > >It also seems that we don't support ISA on all the current corenet =20
> ds
> > >boards. So picking a primary bus seems useless, remove that =20
> function
> > >too.
> >
> > IIRC that was due to some bugs in the PPC PCI code in the absence of
> > any primary bus.
>=20
> Do you know more about these bugs?
Not off the top of my head -- either search the archives or ask Ben.
> > fsl_pci_assign_primary() will arbitrarily pick one
> > to be primary if there's no ISA. Have the bugs been fixed?
>=20
> I know there should be some reason that we put the =20
> fsl_pci_assign_primary()
> here. But frankly I am not sure what bugs this workaround try to fix. =20
> For these
> corenet boards picking one to be primary has no effect to the 64bit =20
> kernel.
> And for 32bit kernel, the only effect of this is that isa_io_base is =20
> set to the
> io virtual base of the primary bus. But the isa_io_base only make =20
> sense when
> we do have a isa bus, so that we can access some well-known io ports =20
> directly
> by using outx/inx. But if we don't have isa bus on the board, the =20
> value of
> isa_io_base should make no sense at all. So we really don't need to =20
> pick a
> fake primary bus. Of course I may miss something, correct me if I am =20
> wrong. :-)
outx/inx can also be used for PCI I/O BARs.
-Scott=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-30 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 12:04 [PATCH 0/3] several cleanup patches for fsl pci Kevin Hao
2013-05-21 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mpc85xx: remove the unneeded pci init functions for corenet ds board Kevin Hao
2013-05-28 22:52 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-30 10:20 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-30 18:54 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-05-31 6:41 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-31 10:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-01 10:59 ` Kevin Hao
2013-06-01 11:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-02 0:07 ` Kevin Hao
2013-06-03 16:42 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-07 2:00 ` Kevin Hao
2013-06-08 0:00 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-23 22:31 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-25 12:54 ` Kevin Hao
2013-07-26 22:43 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-28 0:32 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-31 6:43 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-31 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-01 11:13 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-21 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: fix the unreachable warning message Kevin Hao
2013-05-21 12:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: enable SWIOTLB in function setup_pci_atmu Kevin Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369940099.14679.14@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.