From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Subject: [Patch net-next v1 2/3] igmp: fix return values of some functions
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 11:33:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370403211-6851-2-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370403211-6851-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
There are some places casting the return value to void, actually
they can respect the return value.
And ip_mc_leave_src() can become void, because even if it fails,
the operations after it can still continue.
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/igmp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
index d3218c0..e05b571 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -1834,24 +1834,23 @@ done:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_mc_join_group);
-static int ip_mc_leave_src(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mc_socklist *iml,
+static void ip_mc_leave_src(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mc_socklist *iml,
struct in_device *in_dev)
{
struct ip_sf_socklist *psf = rtnl_dereference(iml->sflist);
- int err;
if (psf == NULL) {
/* any-source empty exclude case */
- return ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
iml->sfmode, 0, NULL, 0);
+ return;
}
- err = ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
iml->sfmode, psf->sl_count, psf->sl_addr, 0);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(iml->sflist, NULL);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
atomic_sub(IP_SFLSIZE(psf->sl_max), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
kfree_rcu(psf, rcu);
- return err;
}
/*
@@ -1884,7 +1883,7 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
iml->multi.imr_address.s_addr)
continue;
- (void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
+ ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
*imlp = iml->next_rcu;
@@ -1896,6 +1895,7 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
kfree_rcu(iml, rcu);
return 0;
}
+
if (!in_dev)
ret = -ENODEV;
rtnl_unlock();
@@ -2027,10 +2027,9 @@ int ip_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk, struct
psl->sl_addr[j+1] = psl->sl_addr[j];
psl->sl_addr[i] = mreqs->imr_sourceaddr;
psl->sl_count++;
- err = 0;
/* update the interface list */
- ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &mreqs->imr_multiaddr, omode, 1,
- &mreqs->imr_sourceaddr, 1);
+ err = ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &mreqs->imr_multiaddr, omode, 1,
+ &mreqs->imr_sourceaddr, 1);
done:
rtnl_unlock();
if (leavegroup)
@@ -2097,22 +2096,23 @@ int ip_mc_msfilter(struct sock *sk, struct ip_msfilter *msf, int ifindex)
}
} else {
newpsl = NULL;
- (void) ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr,
+ err = ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr,
msf->imsf_fmode, 0, NULL, 0);
+ if (err)
+ goto done;
}
psl = rtnl_dereference(pmc->sflist);
if (psl) {
- (void) ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
+ err = ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
psl->sl_count, psl->sl_addr, 0);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
atomic_sub(IP_SFLSIZE(psl->sl_max), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
kfree_rcu(psl, rcu);
} else
- (void) ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
+ err = ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
0, NULL, 0);
rcu_assign_pointer(pmc->sflist, newpsl);
pmc->sfmode = msf->imsf_fmode;
- err = 0;
done:
rtnl_unlock();
if (leavegroup)
@@ -2295,7 +2295,7 @@ void ip_mc_drop_socket(struct sock *sk)
inet->mc_list = iml->next_rcu;
in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, iml->multi.imr_ifindex);
- (void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
+ ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
if (in_dev != NULL)
ip_mc_dec_group(in_dev, iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 3:33 [Patch net-next v1 1/3] igmp: avoid taking RTNL for ip_mc_find_dev() Cong Wang
2013-06-05 3:33 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2013-06-05 3:33 ` [Patch net-next v1 3/3] igmp: convert RTNL lock to a spinlock Cong Wang
2013-06-05 3:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-06-05 5:21 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-05 5:32 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-05 4:07 ` [Patch net-next v1 1/3] igmp: avoid taking RTNL for ip_mc_find_dev() Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 5:23 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1370403211-6851-2-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.