diff for duplicates of <1370459254.26139.7@snotra> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 5e00c95..d5e8a2f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -3,18 +3,18 @@ On 06/05/2013 02:29:47 AM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPE > > > kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, > > > BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_FP_ROUND); -> > > r = RESUME_GUEST; +> > > r =3D RESUME_GUEST; > > > break; > > > > Why not use kvmppc_supports_spe() here, for consistency? -> -> I added cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SPE) for the case specified above, +>=20 +> I added cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SPE) for the case specified above, =20 > but here -> SPE_FP_ROUND is not shared with ALTIVEC. CONFIG_SPE is used in other +> SPE_FP_ROUND is not shared with ALTIVEC. CONFIG_SPE is used in other =20 > places > in KVM without this check, shouldn't be all or nothing? -I'd rather it be consistent, at least between handling one exception +I'd rather it be consistent, at least between handling one exception =20 and another. --Scott +-Scott= diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index fed3cdd..e992974 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ "ref\0300B73AA675FCE4A93EB4FC1D42459FF44EBF7@039-SN2MPN1-011.039d.mgd.msft.net\0" "From\0Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refactor SPE_FP exit handling\0" - "Date\0Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:07:34 +0000\0" + "Date\0Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:07:34 -0500\0" "To\0Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 <B02008@freescale.com>\0" "Cc\0Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>" - kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org> + linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> kvm@vger.kernel.org <kvm@vger.kernel.org> - " linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>\0" + " kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 06/05/2013 02:29:47 AM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:\n" @@ -14,20 +14,20 @@ "> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPE\n" "> > > \t\tkvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu,\n" "> > > BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_FP_ROUND);\n" - "> > > \t\tr = RESUME_GUEST;\n" + "> > > \t\tr =3D RESUME_GUEST;\n" "> > > \t\tbreak;\n" "> >\n" "> > Why not use kvmppc_supports_spe() here, for consistency?\n" - "> \n" - "> I added cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SPE) for the case specified above, \n" + ">=20\n" + "> I added cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SPE) for the case specified above, =20\n" "> but here\n" - "> SPE_FP_ROUND is not shared with ALTIVEC. CONFIG_SPE is used in other \n" + "> SPE_FP_ROUND is not shared with ALTIVEC. CONFIG_SPE is used in other =20\n" "> places\n" "> in KVM without this check, shouldn't be all or nothing?\n" "\n" - "I'd rather it be consistent, at least between handling one exception \n" + "I'd rather it be consistent, at least between handling one exception =20\n" "and another.\n" "\n" - -Scott + -Scott= -fdbcb9a1401f6ef817d70d71ab0ce9c7df7df64049023dfab2221f9948af21a6 +37568b6e6adc035eb5a7d47b35e7b21a35fbcf9d49b0533597cbac4db12d9a9a
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index fed3cdd..70d9ec3 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ "ref\0300B73AA675FCE4A93EB4FC1D42459FF44EBF7@039-SN2MPN1-011.039d.mgd.msft.net\0" "From\0Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refactor SPE_FP exit handling\0" - "Date\0Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:07:34 +0000\0" + "Date\0Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:07:34 -0500\0" "To\0Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 <B02008@freescale.com>\0" "Cc\0Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>" kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org> @@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ "\n" -Scott -fdbcb9a1401f6ef817d70d71ab0ce9c7df7df64049023dfab2221f9948af21a6 +342021dc293aeb0391d1efede3fbe95ba06f10c3b6d6a53a0fcd7f756b865380
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.