Re: [RFC PATCH] Split runqueue to use bitbake-worker

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 08:00 +0000, Voicu, Cristiana wrote:
> I have tested your patches with Hob, but I can't see the issue for it.
> In Hob you can change the configuration at the begging (before
> starting the build task), so when the bitbake-worker will start will
> take the changed configuration. I have tested it changing the
> sstate-cache dir, and everything worked ok (it created a new dir for
> sstate-cache). Also, in Hob I can see the warnings you placed to see
> if the worker is working properly. 
> 
> Is there something I'm missing?

When I start hob I see a number of "setVariable" commands running. These
get set in the core configuration but they do not get set on the
bitbake-worker side.

I don't know which variables get set this way but they won't have any
effect after this patch.

Which variables get set this way? (Easiest way to find out would be to
add print statements to the code I guess).

We may need to change those writes to become actual editing of
local.conf to set values for example.

Cheers,

Richard