From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: libxl: calculating free pages in libvirt Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 00:54:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1370559280.17802.32.camel@Solace> References: <1370526793.18519.266.camel@Solace> <1370527198.24512.251.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1370528712.18519.278.camel@Solace> <51B10433.7050806@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1469902072043983613==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51B10433.7050806@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jim Fehlig Cc: Ian Campbell , libvir-list@redhat.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============1469902072043983613== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4vHMzvC7jyyAQ30KX2wJ" --=-4vHMzvC7jyyAQ30KX2wJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2013-06-06 at 15:50 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On gio, 2013-06-06 at 14:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> This only really matters if libvirt wants to coexist on a host with > >> toolstacks which use claim, otherwise outstanding pages will never be > >> non-zero. I don't know if coexistence is a goal or not. > >> > >> =20 > > Sure, all this is important only if having it is > > important/interesting... Jim? > > =20 >=20 > It would be preferable if libvirt and xl coexisted nicely. No need for > them to inter-operate (e.g. start a vm with libvirt then manage it with > xl), but managing some with xl and others with libvirt should be a goal, > I think :-/. If nothing else, it seems useful for troubleshooting. I > wouldn't want to advise a user to try xl when things are failing for > them with libvirt, only to find that afterwards their libvirt no longer > worked at all. >=20 Mmm... I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean by this, but anyway, I just submitted a patch to libxl adding the symbol necessary to determine whether that field is present or not. If it gets accepted, I can then patch libvirt to use it, within the proper #ifdef...#endif block, of course. Thanks everyone and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-4vHMzvC7jyyAQ30KX2wJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlGxEzAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTQvACgiBWNdYzjhLdsEF6NGLivPl+f I9UAn3BZiP8DiKQ3hyrltcofpX2x0p+F =zxSd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4vHMzvC7jyyAQ30KX2wJ-- --===============1469902072043983613== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============1469902072043983613==--