From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Make note for the scheduler "cap"
 option warning about power management effects
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:58:59 +0200
Message-ID: <1371031139.20028.77.camel@Solace>
References: <1370953898-10278-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
	<1371030255.24512.384.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5340149754593010193=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1371030255.24512.384.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>, Massimo Canonico <mex@di.unipmn.it>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============5340149754593010193==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ERzCHeaHgymOSRDTD0yJ"

--=-ERzCHeaHgymOSRDTD0yJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On mer, 2013-06-12 at 10:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 13:31 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > Suggested-by: Massimo Canonico <mex@di.unipmn.it>
> > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> > CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
> > CC: Massimo Canonico <mex@di.unipmn.it>
>=20
> Seems a bit repetitive but Acked + applied (with Dario's reviewed-by
> too)
>=20
I suppose it is but, given how weird the BIOSes might behave with
respect to this, and looking at how much time it took to track down an
issue that this was causing (compared to what the issue really was!)...
Well, better state it a couple of times than leave _any_ room for people
not noticing it! :-P

Thanks,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-ERzCHeaHgymOSRDTD0yJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlG4RmMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsS7GACfVUw7yHRasxcAsNPlORHHzxtg
dzQAnApg9RqeR0QyyZuPweDDetsoKcOt
=0+YT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ERzCHeaHgymOSRDTD0yJ--


--===============5340149754593010193==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============5340149754593010193==--