From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 <B40534@freescale.com>
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
"anton@enomsg.org" <anton@enomsg.org>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:51:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371142282.2028.10@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ABB05CD9C9F68C46A5CEDC7F15439259F74985@039-SN2MPN1-021.039d.mgd.msft.net> (from B40534@freescale.com on Thu Jun 13 04:55:43 2013)
On 06/13/2013 04:55:43 AM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > > +#else
> > > + /* Save SPRGs */
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(0)
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(1)
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(2)
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(3)
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(4)
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(5)
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(6)
> > > + RESTORE_SPRG(7)
> >
> > Why do we need this on book3e and not on book3s?
> >
> Book3e: SPRG1 used save paca, SPRG2 be defined =20
> SPRN_SPRG_TLB_EXFRAME,...
> I think those register should be save, even now some SPRG register =20
> not be use.
Are those expected/allowed to change as a result of the restore?
-Scott=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-09 10:37 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation Wang Dongsheng
2013-06-09 10:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/hibernate: add restore mmu context after resume Wang Dongsheng
2013-07-10 10:11 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-07-10 21:42 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-12 4:04 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-07-12 21:54 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-12 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-07 9:55 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-06-12 22:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation Scott Wood
2013-06-13 9:55 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-06-13 16:51 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-06-17 5:54 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-06-18 0:01 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 0:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-18 0:22 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 1:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-10 9:41 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-07-10 9:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-10 10:05 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1371142282.2028.10@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=B07421@freescale.com \
--cc=B40534@freescale.com \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.