From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Subject: [Patch net-next v4 1/3] igmp: make some functions void
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:34:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371281684-26587-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> (raw)
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
ip_mc_leave_src() can become avoid, because even if it fails,
the operations after it can still continue.
ip_mc_del_src() can become avoid, because no one cares and
some errors are ignored on purpose.
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/igmp.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
index cd71190..1a6a626 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -1571,15 +1571,15 @@ static int ip_mc_del1_src(struct ip_mc_list *pmc, int sfmode,
#define igmp_ifc_event(x) do { } while (0)
#endif
-static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
- int sfcount, __be32 *psfsrc, int delta)
+static void ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
+ int sfcount, __be32 *psfsrc, int delta)
{
struct ip_mc_list *pmc;
int changerec = 0;
- int i, err;
+ int i;
if (!in_dev)
- return -ENODEV;
+ return;
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_pmc_rcu(in_dev, pmc) {
if (*pmca == pmc->multiaddr)
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
if (!pmc) {
/* MCA not found?? bug */
rcu_read_unlock();
- return -ESRCH;
+ return;
}
spin_lock_bh(&pmc->lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1596,18 +1596,14 @@ static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
sf_markstate(pmc);
#endif
if (!delta) {
- err = -EINVAL;
if (!pmc->sfcount[sfmode])
goto out_unlock;
pmc->sfcount[sfmode]--;
}
- err = 0;
for (i=0; i<sfcount; i++) {
int rv = ip_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[i]);
changerec |= rv > 0;
- if (!err && rv < 0)
- err = rv;
}
if (pmc->sfmode == MCAST_EXCLUDE &&
pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] == 0 &&
@@ -1631,7 +1627,6 @@ static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
}
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_bh(&pmc->lock);
- return err;
}
/*
@@ -1783,7 +1778,7 @@ static int ip_mc_add_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
if (!delta)
pmc->sfcount[sfmode]--;
for (j=0; j<i; j++)
- (void) ip_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[j]);
+ ip_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[j]);
} else if (isexclude != (pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] != 0)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
struct ip_sf_list *psf;
@@ -1887,24 +1882,23 @@ done:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_mc_join_group);
-static int ip_mc_leave_src(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mc_socklist *iml,
- struct in_device *in_dev)
+static void ip_mc_leave_src(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mc_socklist *iml,
+ struct in_device *in_dev)
{
struct ip_sf_socklist *psf = rtnl_dereference(iml->sflist);
- int err;
if (psf == NULL) {
/* any-source empty exclude case */
- return ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
iml->sfmode, 0, NULL, 0);
+ return;
}
- err = ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
iml->sfmode, psf->sl_count, psf->sl_addr, 0);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(iml->sflist, NULL);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
atomic_sub(IP_SFLSIZE(psf->sl_max), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
kfree_rcu(psf, rcu);
- return err;
}
/*
@@ -1937,7 +1931,7 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
iml->multi.imr_address.s_addr)
continue;
- (void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
+ ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
*imlp = iml->next_rcu;
@@ -1949,6 +1943,7 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
kfree_rcu(iml, rcu);
return 0;
}
+
if (!in_dev)
ret = -ENODEV;
rtnl_unlock();
@@ -2085,7 +2080,7 @@ int ip_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk, struct
err = 0;
/* update the interface list */
ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &mreqs->imr_multiaddr, omode, 1,
- &mreqs->imr_sourceaddr, 1);
+ &mreqs->imr_sourceaddr, 1);
done:
rtnl_unlock();
if (leavegroup)
@@ -2156,19 +2151,19 @@ int ip_mc_msfilter(struct sock *sk, struct ip_msfilter *msf, int ifindex)
}
} else {
newpsl = NULL;
- (void) ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr,
- msf->imsf_fmode, 0, NULL, 0);
+ ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr,
+ msf->imsf_fmode, 0, NULL, 0);
}
psl = rtnl_dereference(pmc->sflist);
if (psl) {
- (void) ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
- psl->sl_count, psl->sl_addr, 0);
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
+ psl->sl_count, psl->sl_addr, 0);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
atomic_sub(IP_SFLSIZE(psl->sl_max), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
kfree_rcu(psl, rcu);
} else
- (void) ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
- 0, NULL, 0);
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
+ 0, NULL, 0);
rcu_assign_pointer(pmc->sflist, newpsl);
pmc->sfmode = msf->imsf_fmode;
err = 0;
@@ -2357,7 +2352,7 @@ void ip_mc_drop_socket(struct sock *sk)
inet->mc_list = iml->next_rcu;
in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, iml->multi.imr_ifindex);
- (void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
+ ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
if (in_dev != NULL)
ip_mc_dec_group(in_dev, iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-15 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-15 7:34 Cong Wang [this message]
2013-06-15 7:34 ` [Patch net-next v4 2/3] ipv6,mcast: make some functions void Cong Wang
2013-06-15 7:34 ` [Patch net-next v4 3/3] igmp: convert RTNL lock to a spinlock Cong Wang
2013-06-15 7:36 ` [Patch net-next v4 1/3] igmp: make some functions void Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1371281684-26587-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.