From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Lian Minghuan-b31939 <B31939@freescale.com>
Cc: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Zang Roy-R61911 <r61911@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add MSIIR1 support for MPIC v4.3
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:08:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371578938.9073.30@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BFC749.3080502@freescale.com> (from B31939@freescale.com on Mon Jun 17 21:34:49 2013)
On 06/17/2013 09:34:49 PM, Lian Minghuan-b31939 wrote:
> Hi Soctt,
>=20
> please see my comments inline.
>=20
> On 06/18/2013 08:15 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 06/16/2013 10:00:01 PM, Lian Minghuan-b31939 wrote:
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>=20
>>> please see my comments inline.
>>>=20
>>> On 06/15/2013 06:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>> On 06/14/2013 02:15:56 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h =20
>>>>> b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
>>>>> index 8225f86..43a9d99 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
>>>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>>>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>>>> #include <asm/msi_bitmap.h>
>>>>>=20
>>>>> -#define NR_MSI_REG 8
>>>>> +#define NR_MSI_REG 16
>>>>> #define IRQS_PER_MSI_REG 32
>>>>> #define NR_MSI_IRQS (NR_MSI_REG * IRQS_PER_MSI_REG)
>>>>=20
>>>> I don't see where you update all_avail in fsl_of_msi_probe.
>>>>=20
>>>> We should also be bounds-checking the contents of =20
>>>> msi-available-ranges.
>>>> Currently it looks like we just silently overrun the bitmap if we =20
>>>> get bad
>>>> input from the device tree.
>>>>=20
>>> [Minghuan] all_avail definition: static const u32 all_avail[] =3D { =20
>>> 0, NR_MSI_IRQS };
>>> When changing NR_MSI_REG to 16, NR_MSI_IRQS has been changed to =20
>>> 16*32, and all_avail also is updated.
>>=20
>> That's my point. It shouldn't change for older hardware.
> [Minghaun] the older hardware has 8 registers, mipcv4.3 has 16 =20
> registers. If we do not use 16*32 bitmap to indicate 8*32 irqs.(this =20
> way just only wastes some memory and has no other harm)
Using the larger bitmap unconditionally is fine. What is not fine is, =20
on older hardware, acting as if all 16 irqs are present.
In other words, I'm talking about the contents of the bitmap, not its =20
size.
> we have two choice I think.
> 1. Use a variable assigned value 8 or 16 based on compatible, then =20
> dynamically create bitmap
If we have the mpic4.3 compatible, then we don't even support =20
msi-available-ranges, so we'd skip this code and free everything in the =20
bitmap.
> 2. Add a new file for mpic v4.3.
No. :-)
-Scott=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 7:15 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/dts: add MPIC v4.3 dts node Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add MSIIR1 support for MPIC v4.3 Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:09 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 3:00 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 2:34 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 18:08 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/dts: update MSI bindings doc " Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:06 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:07 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:28 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 0:42 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 2:49 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 16:21 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/dts: remove msi-available-ranges property Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:15 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add 'msiregs' kernel parameter Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:36 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:18 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 3:10 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 16:22 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/dts: add MPIC v4.3 dts node Scott Wood
2013-06-14 21:53 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 2:23 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:18 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1371578938.9073.30@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=B31939@freescale.com \
--cc=Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=r61911@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.