From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Ding@jasper.es
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:00:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372662029.2974.16.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372353355.2060.22.camel@joe-AO722>
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 10:15 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
>
> Hi Cong.
>
> I think this is premature.
>
> Please let the discussion and implementation
> for %pI[gS]<foo> play out and be accepted
> into next before using it in other subsystems.
>
>
Yeah, I already talked with Daniel off-list, and I agree his %pIS patch
should go first.
(Also I apologized to him for forgetting to credit him when I submitted
this patchset.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-01 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 6:43 [RFC Patch net-next 0/5] net: introduce generic type and helpers for IP address Cong Wang
2013-06-27 6:43 ` [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr Cong Wang
2013-06-27 7:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-27 8:14 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-06-27 17:15 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-01 7:00 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2013-06-27 6:43 ` [RFC Patch net-next 2/5] net: introduce generic inet_pton() Cong Wang
2013-06-27 14:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-27 22:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-27 15:32 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-01 7:02 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-27 21:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-01 7:05 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-27 6:43 ` [RFC Patch net-next 3/5] inetpeer: use generic union inet_addr Cong Wang
2013-06-27 8:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-01 8:40 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-27 6:43 ` [RFC Patch net-next 4/5] sunrpc: " Cong Wang
2013-06-27 15:36 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-06-27 15:36 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-01 7:11 ` Cong Wang
2013-07-01 7:11 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-27 15:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-06-27 15:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-01 7:07 ` Cong Wang
2013-07-01 7:07 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-27 6:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC Patch net-next 5/5] nfs, cifs: abstract generic inet_addr_equal_strict() Cong Wang
2013-06-27 6:43 ` [RFC Patch net-next 5/5] nfs,cifs: " Cong Wang
2013-06-27 7:03 ` [RFC Patch net-next 0/5] net: introduce generic type and helpers for IP address Daniel Borkmann
2013-06-27 8:08 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-27 8:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1372662029.2974.16.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=Ding@jasper.es \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.