From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFT] irqchip: sun4i: Remove wrong irq_ack callback implementation
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 22:35:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373121329.13289.2.camel@phoenix> (raw)
According to the datasheet[1], the Interrupt IRQ Pending Registers are
read-only. The implementation of sun4i_irq_ack() looks wrong because it writes
to these read-only registers.
This patch removes the wrong irq_ack callback implementation and all the code
writing to these read-only registers in sun4i_of_init().
[1] http://dl.linux-sunxi.org/A10/A10%20User%20Manual%20-%20v1.20%20%282012-04-09%2c%20DECRYPTED%29.pdf
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
---
Hi Maxime,
I don't have this hardware, I'd appreciate if you can test this patch.
If this patch works, I think we can just drop the patch I sent yesterday.
( It's "irqchip: sun4i: Staticize sun4i_irq_ack()"
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/5/43 )
Thanks,
Axel
drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 18 ------------------
1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
index b66d4ae..29b75c0a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
@@ -38,18 +38,6 @@ static struct irq_domain *sun4i_irq_domain;
static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry sun4i_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
-void sun4i_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
-{
- unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
- unsigned int irq_off = irq % 32;
- int reg = irq / 32;
- u32 val;
-
- val = readl(sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
- writel(val | (1 << irq_off),
- sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
-}
-
static void sun4i_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
{
unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
@@ -76,7 +64,6 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
.name = "sun4i_irq",
- .irq_ack = sun4i_irq_ack,
.irq_mask = sun4i_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = sun4i_irq_unmask,
};
@@ -114,11 +101,6 @@ static int __init sun4i_of_init(struct device_node *node,
writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(1));
writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(2));
- /* Clear all the pending interrupts */
- writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(0));
- writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(1));
- writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(2));
-
/* Enable protection mode */
writel(0x01, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PROTECTION_REG);
--
1.8.1.2
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-06 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-06 14:35 Axel Lin [this message]
2013-07-11 16:13 ` [PATCH RFT] irqchip: sun4i: Remove wrong irq_ack callback implementation Maxime Ripard
2013-07-19 9:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-24 9:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-19 8:20 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1373121329.13289.2.camel@phoenix \
--to=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.