diff for duplicates of <1374693773.15592.59@snotra> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7240b4f..1c7c1a7 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ On 07/23/2013 08:30:32 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > >> What specifically should I do to test it? > > > -> > >Could you double check perf annotate works? I'm 99% sure it will =20 +> > >Could you double check perf annotate works? I'm 99% sure it will > but > > >that is what was failing on ppc64. > > @@ -21,24 +21,24 @@ On 07/23/2013 08:30:32 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Apart from the annoying colors, is there anything specific I should > > be looking for? Some sort of error message, or output that actually > > makes sense? ->=20 +> > The colours look fine on my terminal, so I don't know what you've done > there. -It probably looks better if the terminal is configured to have a light =20 -background (which of course makes some other programs look worse), or =20 -(as I noted) if you've got your monitor set to be very bright. I now =20 -see that xfce4-terminal lets me redefine the standard colors, though, =20 +It probably looks better if the terminal is configured to have a light +background (which of course makes some other programs look worse), or +(as I noted) if you've got your monitor set to be very bright. I now +see that xfce4-terminal lets me redefine the standard colors, though, so that should help. > If you care you can use "--stdio" to use the plainer interface, > though it still uses colours. ->=20 -> That output looks fine in terms of the bug Anton was chasing. As far =20 +> +> That output looks fine in terms of the bug Anton was chasing. As far > as > only ever hitting one instruction that does look weird. -OK. I'll add "investigate weird e500 perf annotate results" to the =20 +OK. I'll add "investigate weird e500 perf annotate results" to the TODO list... --Scott= +-Scott diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0d2d1a5..5b43843 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] module: ppc64 module CRC relocation fix causes perf issues\0" "Date\0Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:22:53 -0500\0" "To\0Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>\0" - "Cc\0Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>" + "Cc\0Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>" + Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> - Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> - " linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org\0" + " <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 07/23/2013 08:30:32 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:\n" @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ "> > >\n" "> > >> What specifically should I do to test it?\n" "> > >\n" - "> > >Could you double check perf annotate works? I'm 99% sure it will =20\n" + "> > >Could you double check perf annotate works? I'm 99% sure it will \n" "> but\n" "> > >that is what was failing on ppc64.\n" "> >\n" @@ -34,26 +34,26 @@ "> > Apart from the annoying colors, is there anything specific I should\n" "> > be looking for? Some sort of error message, or output that actually\n" "> > makes sense?\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> The colours look fine on my terminal, so I don't know what you've done\n" "> there.\n" "\n" - "It probably looks better if the terminal is configured to have a light =20\n" - "background (which of course makes some other programs look worse), or =20\n" - "(as I noted) if you've got your monitor set to be very bright. I now =20\n" - "see that xfce4-terminal lets me redefine the standard colors, though, =20\n" + "It probably looks better if the terminal is configured to have a light \n" + "background (which of course makes some other programs look worse), or \n" + "(as I noted) if you've got your monitor set to be very bright. I now \n" + "see that xfce4-terminal lets me redefine the standard colors, though, \n" "so that should help.\n" "\n" "> If you care you can use \"--stdio\" to use the plainer interface,\n" "> though it still uses colours.\n" - ">=20\n" - "> That output looks fine in terms of the bug Anton was chasing. As far =20\n" + "> \n" + "> That output looks fine in terms of the bug Anton was chasing. As far \n" "> as\n" "> only ever hitting one instruction that does look weird.\n" "\n" - "OK. I'll add \"investigate weird e500 perf annotate results\" to the =20\n" + "OK. I'll add \"investigate weird e500 perf annotate results\" to the \n" "TODO list...\n" "\n" - -Scott= + -Scott -70d79ad33da56e9548c4e92236ff35c09de1817cdc459eed6f33dd509f322c43 +d8c76cd835ccdf354d23561f52e544e6e3daa02a1973cb8f6f54882be18a6b1e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.