From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:23:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Georg =?utf-8?Q?Sch=C3=B6nberger?= Message-ID: <1375438822.629.1381382622441.JavaMail.root@thomas-krenn.com> In-Reply-To: <1475150.01GODAz1Il@merkaba> Subject: Re: new fio release? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe List-ID: Hi Martin and Fio Users, > > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while > > > I did > > > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. > > > > > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think > > > I was > > > almost finished with it but I had: > > > > > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE > > > fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes > > > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio > > > > > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. > > > > > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian > > > packaging > > > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package > > > from a > > > fio release with these issues fixed. > > > > > > > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? > > > > Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes > > between > > 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release. > > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed > and > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable. > > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing. > > Thanks, > -- > Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de > GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 > Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later on 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise? Thanks, Georg