From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:12:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375891974.8154.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130807155918.GA16263@orbit.nwl.cc>
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 17:59 +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> The idea behind this patch is that users setting the protocol to
> something else probably do know better and so should be left alone.
Regardless of that, I think that still the skb pointers would be changed
by this patch which would confuse the receiver of the SKB (device
driver), no? Has anyone verified that theory? :)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 5:54 linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-07 5:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-07 8:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-07 15:59 ` Phil Sutter
2013-08-07 16:12 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-08-07 16:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-07 16:22 ` Johannes Berg
2013-08-07 16:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-07 17:47 ` David Miller
2013-08-07 18:37 ` Phil Sutter
2013-08-07 23:27 ` David Miller
2013-08-07 23:36 ` David Miller
2013-08-08 0:02 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-08 0:09 ` David Miller
2013-08-08 0:13 ` David Miller
2013-08-08 0:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-09 13:58 ` Phil Sutter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-07 5:30 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-07 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-07 5:47 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-07 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-07 8:36 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-08 5:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-08 15:54 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-08-07 11:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-07 6:44 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-07 8:50 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-07 7:40 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-07 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375891974.8154.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.