From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B17B61013 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r7B7koFk018391 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 08:46:50 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qunTQZiVXCrY for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 08:46:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r7B7khgp018383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 08:46:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1376206543.27470.24.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 08:35:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: what sources are *not* fetched by a "-c fetchall"? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:35:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > currently testing a build for my beaglebone black using the meta-ti > layer and, as i am wont to do, i did a: > > $ bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal > > to (allegedly) fetch everything i would need for such a build. > > at that point, i did: > > $ bitbake core-image-minimal > > and while this is running, i can see more source tarballs being pulled > into the downloads directory -- examples: > > * file-5.13.tar.gz > * icu4c-50_1_2-src.tgz > * mklibs_0.1.34.tar.gz > * pcre-8.32.tar.bz2 > > and perhaps more since the build is not yet done. > > what is it about these particular packages that doesn't fall under > the regular fetching from "-c fetchall"? Which version of bitbake and the metadata was this with? There were some issues fixed in that area fairly recently if I remember rightly. Cheers, Richard