From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pawel Moll Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:35:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1376573746.18617.45.camel@hornet> References: <1376507361-26907-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1376507361-26907-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kumar Gala Cc: "ohad@wizery.com" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Jeffrey Hugo , Eric Holmberg List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 20:09 +0100, Kumar Gala wrote: > +Required properties: > +- compatible: should be "qcom,tcsr-mutex" > +- reg: Should contain registers location and length of mutex registe= rs > +- reg-names: > + "mutex-base" - string to identify mutex registers Just out of curiosity, why is reg-names required? Especially if there seem to be only one set of registers? Pawe=C5=82