From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] tracing: add basic event trigger framework
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:54:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377201249.1620.93.camel@empanada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5203570E.3020201@hitachi.com>
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 17:30 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/07/30 1:40), Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > +struct event_command {
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + char *name;
> > + enum trigger_mode trigger_mode;
> > + bool post_trigger;
> > + int (*func)(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> > + void *cmd_data, char *glob, char *cmd,
> > + char *params, int enable);
> > + int (*reg)(char *glob,
> > + struct event_trigger_ops *trigger_ops,
> > + void *trigger_data, void *cmd_data);
> > + void (*unreg)(char *glob,
> > + struct event_trigger_ops *trigger_ops,
> > + void *trigger_data, void *cmd_data);
> > + int (*set_filter)(char *filter_str,
> > + void *trigger_data,
> > + void *cmd_data);
>
> I think you should pass trace_event_file *file (see below) instead of ambiguous
> void *cmd_data, because all handler implementations expect that.
>
>
> [...]
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/ctype.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +#include "trace.h"
> > +
> > +static LIST_HEAD(trigger_commands);
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(trigger_cmd_mutex);
> > +
> > +struct event_trigger_data {
> > + struct ftrace_event_file *file;
> > + unsigned long count;
> > + int ref;
> > + bool enable;
> > + struct event_trigger_ops *ops;
> > + enum trigger_mode mode;
> > + struct event_filter *filter;
> > + char *filter_str;
> > + struct list_head list;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct trigger_iterator {
> > + struct ftrace_event_file *file;
> > +};
>
> Why would you define this trigger_iterator even if it has
> only one member? This means all iterators can be replaced
> by the file. I'd like to keep it simple.
>
Right, this and the void *cmd_data are vestiges of the original patchset
where I tried to keep the ftrace_triggers and event_triggers unified.
This was meant to be a common iterator abstration which obviously is no
longer needed and has been removed in the new patchset.
> > +
> > +void event_triggers_call(struct ftrace_event_file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct event_trigger_data *data;
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(&file->triggers))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + preempt_disable_notrace();
> > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &file->triggers, list)
> > + data->ops->func((void **)&data);
> > + preempt_enable_notrace();
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(event_triggers_call);
> > +
> > +static void *trigger_next(struct seq_file *m, void *t, loff_t *pos)
> > +{
> > + struct trigger_iterator *iter = m->private;
> > +
> > + return seq_list_next(t, &iter->file->triggers, pos);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void *trigger_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> > +{
> > + struct trigger_iterator *iter = m->private;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> > +
> > + return seq_list_start(&iter->file->triggers, *pos);
> > +}
>
> By Oleg's bugfixes, we are now using event_file_data(filp)
> please refer the f_start/trace_format_open implementation
> which is the closest usage of the trigger file.
>
>
> > +static int event_trigger_regex_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct trigger_iterator *iter;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + iter = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!iter)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> > +
> > + iter->file = inode->i_private;
> > +
> > + if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) {
> > + ret = seq_open(file, &event_triggers_seq_ops);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> > + m->private = iter;
> > + } else {
> > + /* Failed */
> > + kfree(iter);
> > + }
> > + } else
> > + file->private_data = iter;
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> As you can see in trace_format_open(), now file->private_data and
> m->private will point struct file *, don't need to allocate something.
>
Right, and this has all been simplified now too as a result..
> > +static ssize_t event_trigger_regex_write(struct file *file,
> > + const char __user *ubuf,
> > + size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos, int enable)
> > +{
> > + struct trigger_iterator *iter = file->private_data;
> > + ssize_t ret;
> > + char *buf;
> > +
> > + if (!cnt)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (cnt >= PAGE_SIZE)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) {
> > + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> > + iter = m->private;
> > + } else
> > + iter = file->private_data;
> > +
> > + buf = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_TEMPORARY);
> > + if (!buf)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, cnt)) {
> > + free_page((unsigned long) buf);
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + }
> > + buf[cnt] = '\0';
> > + strim(buf);
> > +
> > + ret = trigger_process_regex(iter, buf, enable);
>
> You also need to get event_mutex while processing event_file to
> prevent unexpected releasing.
>
Thanks for catching that too.
> > +
> > + free_page((unsigned long) buf);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + *ppos += cnt;
> > + ret = cnt;
> > + out:
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> Thank you,
>
Thank you.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 16:40 [PATCH v4 00/11] tracing: trace event triggers Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events Tom Zanussi
2013-08-05 11:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] tracing: add basic event trigger framework Tom Zanussi
2013-08-08 8:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-08-22 19:54 ` Tom Zanussi [this message]
2013-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] tracing: add 'traceon' and 'traceoff' event trigger commands Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] tracing: add 'snapshot' event trigger command Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] tracing: add 'stacktrace' " Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] tracing: add 'enable_event' and 'disable_event' event trigger commands Tom Zanussi
2013-08-08 5:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] tracing: add and use generic set_trigger_filter() implementation Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] tracing: update event filters for multibuffer Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] tracing: add documentation for trace event triggers Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] tracing: make register/unregister_ftrace_command __init Tom Zanussi
2013-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] tracing: change event_trigger_open to verify i_private != NULL Tom Zanussi
2013-08-08 2:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] tracing: trace event triggers Masami Hiramatsu
2013-08-08 2:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-22 19:48 ` Tom Zanussi
2013-08-22 23:26 ` Tom Zanussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1377201249.1620.93.camel@empanada \
--to=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.