From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753004Ab3H0X3M (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:29:12 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:8394 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751522Ab3H0X3L (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:29:11 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,971,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="394405294" Message-ID: <1377646146.15688.52.camel@empanada> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events From: Tom Zanussi To: Steven Rostedt Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:29:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130827160150.36f10869@gandalf.local.home> References: <20130827160150.36f10869@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.1 (3.4.1-2.fc17) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 16:01 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:40:13 -0500 > Tom Zanussi wrote: > > return; > > - if (!test_bit(syscall_nr, tr->enabled_enter_syscalls)) > > + > > + /* Here we're inside the tp handler's rcu_read_lock (__DO_TRACE()) */ > > + ftrace_file = rcu_dereference_raw(tr->enter_syscall_files[syscall_nr]); > > What's the reason for using rcu_dereference_raw() and not normal > rcu_dereference? > This is because we know the tracepoint handler has rcu_read_lock_held() and so we don't need to do the rcu_dereference_check(). Tom > -- Steve > > > + if (!ftrace_file) > > + return; > > + > > + if (test_bit(FTRACE_EVENT_FL_SOFT_DISABLED_BIT, &ftrace_file->flags)) > > return; > >