From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] audit: fix incorrect order of log new and old feature
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:49:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383234586.3510.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031153945.GC3399@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:39 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:27:56PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Gao,
>
> Could you provide some description, justification and references for
> each of the patches in this patchset please?
Gao, you may also included my Acked-by: on all three. I thought the
descriptions in the subject were enough, but if you can include a
sentence in the body that would be great.
>
> > ---
> > kernel/audit.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > index 7c7c028..f16f835 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static void audit_log_feature_change(int which, u32 old_feature, u32 new_feature
> > struct audit_buffer *ab;
> >
> > ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE);
> > - audit_log_format(ab, "feature=%s new=%d old=%d old_lock=%d new_lock=%d res=%d",
> > + audit_log_format(ab, "feature=%s old=%d new=%d old_lock=%d new_lock=%d res=%d",
> > audit_feature_names[which], !!old_feature, !!new_feature,
> > !!old_lock, !!new_lock, res);
> > audit_log_end(ab);
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
> - RGB
>
> --
> Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
> Senior Software Engineer
> Kernel Security
> AMER ENG Base Operating Systems
> Remote, Ottawa, Canada
> Voice: +1.647.777.2635
> Internal: (81) 32635
> Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-31 8:27 [PATCH 1/3] audit: fix incorrect order of log new and old feature Gao feng
2013-10-31 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] audit: don't generate audit feature changed log when audit disabled Gao feng
2013-10-31 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] audit: use old_lock in audit_set_feature Gao feng
2013-10-31 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] audit: fix incorrect order of log new and old feature Richard Guy Briggs
2013-10-31 15:49 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2013-11-01 0:55 ` Gao feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1383234586.3510.4.camel@localhost \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.