From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: add efi_whitelist_table to use all efi variable storage Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:47:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1385142450.2884.1.camel@x230> References: <528C740A.6010407@jp.fujitsu.com> <1384963376.20536.3.camel@x230> <528DD3E0.3050606@jp.fujitsu.com> <1385064722.12107.1.camel@x230> <528E9EB2.3060808@jp.fujitsu.com> <1385078632.12107.3.camel@x230> <528EF87D.4050300@jp.fujitsu.com> <528EF9CE.2070305@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <528EF9CE.2070305@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <5B0F50E015387A4DB48F215A3FAEBCDA@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com" Cc: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "matt.fleming@intel.com" , "jlee@suse.com" , "matt@console-pimps.org" , "richard@nod.at" , "cxie@redhat.com" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org T24gRnJpLCAyMDEzLTExLTIyIGF0IDE1OjI5ICswOTAwLCBZYXN1YWtpIElzaGltYXRzdSB3cm90 ZToNCg0KPiArCQkJRE1JX01BVENIKERNSV9TWVNfVkVORE9SLCAiRlVKSVRTVSIpLA0KPiArCQkJ RE1JX01BVENIKERNSV9QUk9EVUNUX05BTUUsICJQUklNRVFVRVNUIiksDQoNCkNhbiB3ZSBndWFy YW50ZWUgdGhhdCBubyBQcmltZXF1ZXN0cyBoYXZlIHRoaXMgaXNzdWU/IENhbiB3ZSBndWFyYW50 ZWUNCnRoYXQgdGhhdCBubyBwcmlvciBmaXJtd2FyZSB2ZXJzaW9ucyBoYXZlIHRoaXMgaXNzdWU/ IENhbiB3ZSBndWFyYW50ZWUNCnRoYXQgbm8gZnV0dXJlIGZpcm13YXJlIHZlcnNpb25zIHdpbGwg aGF2ZSB0aGlzIGlzc3VlPw0KDQotLSANCk1hdHRoZXcgR2FycmV0dCA8bWF0dGhldy5nYXJyZXR0 QG5lYnVsYS5jb20+DQo= From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755979Ab3KVRri (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:47:38 -0500 Received: from mail-by2lp0243.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.243]:37550 "EHLO na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755911Ab3KVRre (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:47:34 -0500 From: Matthew Garrett To: "isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com" CC: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "matt.fleming@intel.com" , "jlee@suse.com" , "matt@console-pimps.org" , "richard@nod.at" , "cxie@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: add efi_whitelist_table to use all efi variable storage Thread-Topic: [PATCH] x86, efi: add efi_whitelist_table to use all efi variable storage Thread-Index: AQHO50xcuy9Y6e7oj0WIb9lvfIqgUpoxhzsA Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:47:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1385142450.2884.1.camel@x230> References: <528C740A.6010407@jp.fujitsu.com> <1384963376.20536.3.camel@x230> <528DD3E0.3050606@jp.fujitsu.com> <1385064722.12107.1.camel@x230> <528E9EB2.3060808@jp.fujitsu.com> <1385078632.12107.3.camel@x230> <528EF87D.4050300@jp.fujitsu.com> <528EF9CE.2070305@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <528EF9CE.2070305@jp.fujitsu.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [209.6.207.143] x-forefront-prvs: 0038DE95A2 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(377424004)(199002)(189002)(24454002)(59766001)(69226001)(76786001)(74876001)(76796001)(83072001)(77982001)(33646001)(74706001)(81816001)(56816003)(56776001)(85306002)(77096001)(33716001)(54316002)(50986001)(47976001)(81686001)(19580395003)(2656002)(74662001)(81342001)(74366001)(83322001)(19580405001)(81542001)(47736001)(87936001)(31966008)(49866001)(65816001)(80022001)(4396001)(87266001)(47446002)(80976001)(74502001)(54356001)(66066001)(79102001)(51856001)(63696002)(76482001)(46102001)(53806001)(60764002);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BN1PR05MB423;H:BN1PR05MB423.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;CLIP:209.6.207.143;FPR:;RD:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <5B0F50E015387A4DB48F215A3FAEBCDA@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nebula.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id rAMHlubE024703 On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 15:29 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "FUJITSU"), > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "PRIMEQUEST"), Can we guarantee that no Primequests have this issue? Can we guarantee that that no prior firmware versions have this issue? Can we guarantee that no future firmware versions will have this issue? -- Matthew Garrett {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I