From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE576D8C4 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rB3I0rf5023687; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:00:53 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ydUb7r0W2-UF; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:00:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rB3I0o03023684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:00:52 GMT Message-ID: <1386093645.4463.128.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Henning Heinold Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:00:45 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20131203173732.GD11291@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20131203160858.GB11291@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <529E0A3D.50809@balister.org> <20131203165509.GC11291@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20131203173732.GD11291@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Status for "Sponsored by" git tags X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:01:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 18:37 +0100, Henning Heinold wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:21:10PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Henning Heinold > > Urk. Of the top of my head .. that just looks nasty. Signed-off-by: > > already indicates > > a company name, so going further than that is overkill IMHO. > > > > Bruce > > But what if it is contractor work, where the commiter has no company email. Well, in the same way we acknowledge people who helped with a patch, you can mention people/companies by name in commit messages and I can't see an issue with that. I don't think it needs a specific tag form though. Cheers, Richard