From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1386258595.2469.18.camel@d30> Subject: Re: avtab dense hash table From: Dominick Grift To: Stephen Smalley Cc: Pavel Roschin , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:49:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52A08A87.2030009@tycho.nsa.gov> References: <20131205130431.7fe3c727.roshin@scriptumplus.ru> <52A08A87.2030009@tycho.nsa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 09:15 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: > So, first, originally the policy was much smaller. I'm personally of > the view that people need to take a chainsaw to the refpolicy and look > to greatly coalesce domains/types Could you please give some examples of existing types that you would merge or even remove and why. I might be able to find patterns in how you decide when its worth to merge types and when not in your opinion. I generally like the idea but i could use some inspiration. Where would you draw the line and why? -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.