From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755388Ab3LJPzY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:55:24 -0500 Received: from am1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.204]:35305 "EHLO am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752710Ab3LJPzU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:55:20 -0500 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.35.236.232;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:SJ-ITEXEDGE02.altera.priv.altera.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 4 X-BigFish: VS4(zz98dI936eI1432I4015Izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h8275bh1de097hz2fh2a8h839h93fhd24hd2bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h1898h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah224fh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1e23h1fe8h1ff5h2218h2216h226dh22d0h2327h2336h286p1155h) Message-ID: <1386690820.6211.4.camel@linux-builds1> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] clocksource: dw_apb_timer_of: Fix read_sched_clock From: Dinh Nguyen To: Ingo Molnar CC: , , , , , , Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:53:40 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20131210155349.GC1995@gmail.com> References: <1386690395-27182-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <20131210155349.GC1995@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: altera.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 16:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * dinguyen@altera.com wrote: > > > From: Dinh Nguyen > > > > The read_sched_clock should return the ~value because the clock is a > > countdown implementation. read_sched_clock() should be the same as > > __apbt_read_clocksource(). > > > > Maintain backwards compatibility for "dw-apb-timer-sp" and > > "dw-apb-timer-osc". > > Are these two independent fixes? If yes then they should be in > separate patches. In general we want to apply minimized, obvious, > single-purpose fix patches. Yes, I will split them. Thanks, Dinh > > Thanks, > > Ingo >