All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Potentially unbounded allocations in seq_read?
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:59:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386784797.6066.63.camel@tursulin-linux.isw.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131211174909.GW10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:49 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:04:41PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > It seems that the buffer allocation in seq_read can double in size
> > indefinitely, at least I've seen that in practice with /proc/<pid>/smaps
> > (attempting to double m->size to 4M on a read of 1000 bytes). This
> > produces an ugly WARN_ON_ONCE, which should perhaps be avoided? (given
> > that it can be triggered by userspace at will)
> 
> An entry in /proc/<pid>/smaps that did not fit into 2Mb?  Seriously?
> How in hell has that happened?  If you can trigger that at will, please
> post the reproducer.

Yeah, no, wrong assumption. It was not about the size but the number of
reads. For example:

open("/proc/3131/smaps", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
fstat64(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0666, st_rdev=makedev(1, 3), ...}) = 0
brk(0xf9019000)                         = 0xf9019000
read(3, "be483000-be4ab000 rw-s 00000000 "..., 4096) = 4054
write(1, "be483000-be4ab000 rw-s 00000000 "..., 4054) = 4054
read(3, "be5c3000-be5c5000 rw-s 10da3f000"..., 4096) = 3656
write(1, "be5c3000-be5c5000 rw-s 10da3f000"..., 3656) = 3656
read(3, "be6b1000-be6b2000 rw-s 10da48000"..., 4096) = 3661
write(1, "be6b1000-be6b2000 rw-s 10da48000"..., 3661) = 3661
read(3, "be6b9000-be6ba000 rw-s 10da38000"..., 4096) = 3599
write(1, "be6b9000-be6ba000 rw-s 10da38000"..., 3599) = 3599
read(3, "be6d6000-be7b6000 rw-s 10d889000"..., 4096) = 3599
write(1, "be6d6000-be7b6000 rw-s 10d889000"..., 3599) = 3599
read(3, "be884000-be885000 rw-s 10d85c000"..., 4096) = 3661
write(1, "be884000-be885000 rw-s 10d85c000"..., 3661) = 3661
read(3, "be88d000-be8de000 rw-p 00000000 "..., 4096) = 4007
write(1, "be88d000-be8de000 rw-p 00000000 "..., 4007) = 4007
read(3, "bea29000-bea4d000 r-xp 00000000 "..., 4096) = 4057
write(1, "bea29000-bea4d000 r-xp 00000000 "..., 4057) = 4057
read(3, "beab3000-bead0000 r--p 00000000 "..., 4096) = 2092
write(1, "beab3000-bead0000 r--p 00000000 "..., 2092) = 2092
read(3, 0xf9017030, 4096)               = -1 ENOMEM (Out of memory)

Regards,
Tvrtko

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-11 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-11 17:04 Potentially unbounded allocations in seq_read? Tvrtko Ursulin
2013-12-11 17:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2013-12-11 18:00   ` Al Viro
2013-12-11 17:49 ` Al Viro
2013-12-11 17:59   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2013-12-11 18:07     ` Al Viro
2013-12-12 13:40       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2013-12-12 13:49         ` Al Viro
2013-12-12 13:59           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2013-12-12 14:21             ` Al Viro
2013-12-12 14:52               ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1386784797.6066.63.camel@tursulin-linux.isw.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.