From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paulo Zanoni Subject: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: extract hsw_power_well_post_{enable, disable} Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:50:09 -0200 Message-ID: <1386795010-1635-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> References: <1386795010-1635-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D89AFA606 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:50:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e9so5385250qcy.40 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:50:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1386795010-1635-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org From: Paulo Zanoni I want to add more code to the post_enable function. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index c01d08d..ce2a188 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -5682,12 +5682,53 @@ bool intel_display_power_enabled(struct drm_device *dev, return is_enabled; } +static void hsw_power_well_post_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev; + unsigned long irqflags; + + if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags); + I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_B), + dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B]); + I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_B), + ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B] | + GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK); + I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_C), + dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C]); + I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C), + ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C] | + GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK); + POSTING_READ(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C)); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags); + } +} + +static void hsw_power_well_post_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev; + enum pipe p; + unsigned long irqflags; + + /* + * After this, the registers on the pipes that are part of the power + * well will become zero, so we have to adjust our counters according to + * that. + * + * FIXME: Should we do this in general in drm_vblank_post_modeset? + */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags); + for_each_pipe(p) + if (p != PIPE_A) + dev->vblank[p].last = 0; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags); +} + static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_device *dev, struct i915_power_well *power_well, bool enable) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; bool is_enabled, enable_requested; - unsigned long irqflags; uint32_t tmp; WARN_ON(dev_priv->pc8.enabled); @@ -5708,42 +5749,14 @@ static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_device *dev, DRM_ERROR("Timeout enabling power well\n"); } - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags); - I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_B), - dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B]); - I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_B), - ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B] | - GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK); - I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_C), - dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C]); - I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C), - ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C] | - GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK); - POSTING_READ(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C)); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags); - } + hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv); } else { if (enable_requested) { - enum pipe p; - I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, 0); POSTING_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER); DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requesting to disable the power well\n"); - /* - * After this, the registers on the pipes that are part - * of the power well will become zero, so we have to - * adjust our counters according to that. - * - * FIXME: Should we do this in general in - * drm_vblank_post_modeset? - */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags); - for_each_pipe(p) - if (p != PIPE_A) - dev->vblank[p].last = 0; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags); + hsw_power_well_post_disable(dev_priv); } } } -- 1.8.3.1