From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
JBottomley@parallels.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] pci: use device_remove_file_self() instead of device_schedule_callback()
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:59:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389117590-25705-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389117590-25705-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
driver-core now supports synchrnous self-deletion of attributes and
the asynchrnous removal mechanism is scheduled for removal. Use it
instead of device_schedule_callback(). This makes "remove" behave
synchronously.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 24 ++++++------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index c91e6c1..94d1cb8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -352,32 +352,20 @@ static struct device_attribute dev_rescan_attr = __ATTR(rescan,
(S_IWUSR|S_IWGRP),
NULL, dev_rescan_store);
-static void remove_callback(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
-
- mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
- pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
- mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
-}
-
static ssize_t
-remove_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *dummy,
+remove_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- int ret = 0;
unsigned long val;
if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val) < 0)
return -EINVAL;
- /* An attribute cannot be unregistered by one of its own methods,
- * so we have to use this roundabout approach.
- */
- if (val)
- ret = device_schedule_callback(dev, remove_callback);
- if (ret)
- count = ret;
+ if (val && device_remove_file_self(dev, attr)) {
+ mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
+ pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(to_pci_dev(dev));
+ mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
+ }
return count;
}
static struct device_attribute dev_remove_attr = __ATTR(remove,
--
1.8.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 17:59 [PATCHSET driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 01/12] kernfs: fix get_active failure handling in kernfs_seq_*() Tejun Heo
2014-01-10 13:48 ` Sasha Levin
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 02/12] kernfs: replace kernfs_node->u.completion with kernfs_root->deactivate_waitq Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 03/12] kernfs: restructure removal path to fix possible premature return Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 04/12] kernfs: invoke kernfs_unmap_bin_file() directly from kernfs_deactivate() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 05/12] kernfs: remove kernfs_addrm_cxt Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 06/12] kernfs: remove KERNFS_ACTIVE_REF and add kernfs_lockdep() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 07/12] kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 08/12] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement kernfs_remove_self() and its wrappers Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 18:36 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 10/12] scsi: use device_remove_file_self() instead of device_schedule_callback() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 11/12] s390: " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 12/12] remove-unused-callback-mechanism Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 18:04 ` [PATCH REPOST 12/12] sysfs, driver-core: remove unused {sysfs|device}_schedule_callback_owner() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 21:41 ` [PATCHSET driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal Tejun Heo
2014-01-08 1:01 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-03 19:02 [PATCHSET v5 " Tejun Heo
2014-02-03 19:03 ` [PATCH 09/12] pci: use device_remove_file_self() instead of device_schedule_callback() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389117590-25705-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.