From: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: PowerPC email list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH powerpc] Fix compile error of pgtable-ppc64.h
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:30:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389965453.5628.3.camel@ThinkPad-T5421> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vbxj6qp1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:27 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use
> > struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:81,
> > from include/linux/seqlock.h:35,
> > from include/linux/time.h:5,
> > from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56,
> > from include/linux/timex.h:56,
> > from include/linux/sched.h:17,
> > from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17:
> > include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t'
> > /root/linux-next/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here
> >
>
> what compiler version ? I have seen that error in gcc 4.3 and it was
> concluded that it is too old a compiler version to worry about. That
> specific compiler version also gave error for forward declaring struct;
gcc version 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3) (GCC), and it doesn't
report error after use struct directly.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h | 6 +++---
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> > index d27960c..bc141c9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> > @@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > pmd_t *pmdp);
> >
> > #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
> > -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
> > -static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
> > - spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
> > +struct spinlock;
> > +static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
> > + struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
> > {
> > /*
> > * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 6:10 [RFC PATCH powerpc] Fix compile error of pgtable-ppc64.h Li Zhong
2014-01-17 6:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-17 13:30 ` Li Zhong [this message]
2014-01-17 20:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389965453.5628.3.camel@ThinkPad-T5421 \
--to=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.