From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Janet Morgan <janet.morgan@Intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@Intel.com>, Ruiv Wang <ruiv.wang@gmail.com>,
Gong Chen <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@Intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, cpu hotplug, use cpumask stack safe variant cpumask_var_t in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:39:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389965961-14975-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> (raw)
kbuild, 0day kernel build service, outputs the warning:
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:333:1: warning: the frame size of 2056 bytes
is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
because check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable() allocates two cpumasks on the
stack. Fix this by using cpumask_var_t, the cpumask stack safe variant.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Janet Morgan <janet.morgan@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiv Wang <ruiv.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Gong Chen <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gong Chen <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 4207e8d..b760c8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -269,15 +269,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vector_used_by_percpu_irq);
*/
int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
{
- int irq, cpu;
+ int irq, cpu, ret = 0;
unsigned int this_cpu, vector, this_count, count;
struct irq_desc *desc;
struct irq_data *data;
- struct cpumask affinity_new, online_new;
+ cpumask_var_t affinity_new, online_new;
+
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&online_new, GFP_KERNEL)){
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&affinity_new, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto free_online_new;
+ }
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
- cpu_clear(this_cpu, online_new);
+ cpumask_copy(online_new, cpu_online_mask);
+ __cpu_clear(this_cpu, online_new);
this_count = 0;
for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
@@ -285,8 +295,8 @@ int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
if (irq >= 0) {
desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
- cpumask_copy(&affinity_new, data->affinity);
- cpu_clear(this_cpu, affinity_new);
+ cpumask_copy(affinity_new, data->affinity);
+ __cpu_clear(this_cpu, affinity_new);
/* Do not count inactive or per-cpu irqs. */
if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data))
@@ -307,8 +317,8 @@ int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
* mask is not zero; that is the down'd cpu is the
* last online cpu in a user set affinity mask.
*/
- if (cpumask_empty(&affinity_new) ||
- !cpumask_subset(&affinity_new, &online_new))
+ if (cpumask_empty(affinity_new) ||
+ !cpumask_subset(affinity_new, online_new))
this_count++;
}
}
@@ -327,9 +337,14 @@ int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
if (count < this_count) {
pr_warn("CPU %d disable failed: CPU has %u vectors assigned and there are only %u available.\n",
this_cpu, this_count, count);
- return -ERANGE;
+ ret = -ERANGE;
}
- return 0;
+
+ free_cpumask_var(affinity_new);
+free_online_new:
+ free_cpumask_var(online_new);
+out:
+ return ret;
}
/* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
--
1.7.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 13:39 Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2014-01-20 8:50 ` [PATCH] x86, cpu hotplug, use cpumask stack safe variant cpumask_var_t in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable() Chen, Gong
2014-01-20 18:57 ` [PATCH] x86, cpu hotplug, use cpumask stack safe variant cpumask_var_t in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable() [v2] Prarit Bhargava
2014-01-22 2:00 ` Chen, Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389965961-14975-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@Intel.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=janet.morgan@Intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=ruiv.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=seiji.aguchi@hds.com \
--cc=tony.luck@Intel.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.