From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: Xen nested wiki Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:29:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4298551883746762847==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich (JBeulich@suse.com)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============4298551883746762847== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7" --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Adding the Xen publicity mailing list] On gio, 2014-02-13 at 03:55 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Hi George, >=20 > I have updated the Latest Xen nested status in the Xen wiki page, please = have a look. > Hey Yang, This is something really useful to have on the wiki, thanks for doing it. > Although it is hard to say nested is good supported or product quality, i= t is ready to let people to know nested basically is supported by Xen. > Right. With that in mind, I think this topic would be a great one for a blog post on the Xen Project's blog! The content you have on the wiki is mostly fine as the core content of the blog post too, we'd just need a couple more "colloquial" glue paragraph here and there, both about nested virt in general and about Xen supporting it, for instance... > Especially, for Xen on Xen case, I didn't see any issue with it for more = than half of year. Besides, I am always using nested Xen to debug Xen booti= ng issue which doesn't need to reboot my real box. And it really helps me a= lot. > ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good example of what I meant above! :-) So, how do you feel about this? > So, if possible, I hope we can add nested support into Xen 4.4 release to= let people know current status. >=20 Sorry for my ignorance on the subject, what is it that is missing for making the above (and the content of the wiki) true for 4.4? Anyway, I don't think that, whatever the answer is, it will be less worth to have a blog post about nested virt... At most it will affect when we want it. If it's going to be a 4.4 feature, I think the sooner the better. If not, we can wait a little bit. Let me know your thoughts on the idea. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL8npYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSaFQCfVbJ9erMECygVJUbsvp32+Vk0 N3kAn2yv2Usyr48b8fhTg4rD4ZfEYSVM =CnHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7-- --===============4298551883746762847== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============4298551883746762847==--