From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from goalie.tycho.ncsc.mil (goalie [144.51.31.250]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r39H0Yte014879 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:00:34 -0400 From: Paul Moore To: David Miller Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mvadkert@redhat.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:00:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1392983.dvWWkBd8H0@sifl> In-Reply-To: <20130409.125635.1837917915399498838.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1365520026.3887.139.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1365521576.3887.147.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130409.125635.1837917915399498838.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:56:35 PM David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:32:56 -0700 > > > It looks like _I_ have to do your work. Sorry, I have no more time to > > spend on this topic. You'll have to convince David, not me. > > I already have no interest in considering these changes seriously, > and I've already asked Paul multiple times to drop this idea. If we address all of your technical concerns, why are you not interested in allowing a security blob in the sk_buff? -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:00:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1392983.dvWWkBd8H0@sifl> References: <1365520026.3887.139.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1365521576.3887.147.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130409.125635.1837917915399498838.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mvadkert@redhat.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130409.125635.1837917915399498838.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:56:35 PM David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:32:56 -0700 > > > It looks like _I_ have to do your work. Sorry, I have no more time to > > spend on this topic. You'll have to convince David, not me. > > I already have no interest in considering these changes seriously, > and I've already asked Paul multiple times to drop this idea. If we address all of your technical concerns, why are you not interested in allowing a security blob in the sk_buff? -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat