All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/powernv: Cleanup on PNV_EEH_STATE_ENABLED
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 06:56:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393012609.6771.90.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392983613-10090-3-git-send-email-shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 19:53 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The flag PNV_EEH_STATE_ENABLED is put into pnv_phb::eeh_state, which
> is protected by CONFIG_EEH. We needn't that. Instead, we can have
> pnv_phb::flags and maintain all flags there, which is the purpose
> of the patch.

Can you explain a bit more why we want to create a new flag set
that didn't exist before ? This adds confusion so we need a very
good reason... Do we need to know about the enable state of EEH
even when CNFIG_EEH is not set ?

Cheers,
Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c |    2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c      |    8 ++------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h      |    7 +++----
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
> index 0d1d424..04b4710 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int ioda_eeh_post_init(struct pci_controller *hose)
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> -	phb->eeh_state |= PNV_EEH_STATE_ENABLED;
> +	phb->flags |= PNV_PHB_FLAG_EEH;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c
> index b555ebc..437c37d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ int pnv_pci_cfg_read(struct device_node *dn,
>  	if (phb_pe && (phb_pe->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED))
>  		return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
>  
> -	if (phb->eeh_state & PNV_EEH_STATE_ENABLED) {
> +	if (phb->flags & PNV_PHB_FLAG_EEH) {
>  		if (*val == EEH_IO_ERROR_VALUE(size) &&
>  		    eeh_dev_check_failure(of_node_to_eeh_dev(dn)))
>  			return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> @@ -434,12 +434,8 @@ int pnv_pci_cfg_write(struct device_node *dn,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check if the PHB got frozen due to an error (no response) */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
> -	if (!(phb->eeh_state & PNV_EEH_STATE_ENABLED))
> +	if (!(phb->flags & PNV_PHB_FLAG_EEH))
>  		pnv_pci_config_check_eeh(phb, dn);
> -#else
> -	pnv_pci_config_check_eeh(phb, dn);
> -#endif
>  
>  	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> index dbeba3d..adeb3c4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> @@ -79,24 +79,23 @@ struct pnv_eeh_ops {
>  	int (*configure_bridge)(struct eeh_pe *pe);
>  	int (*next_error)(struct eeh_pe **pe);
>  };
> -
> -#define PNV_EEH_STATE_ENABLED	(1 << 0)	/* EEH enabled	*/
> -
>  #endif /* CONFIG_EEH */
>  
> +#define PNV_PHB_FLAG_EEH	(1 << 0)
> +
>  struct pnv_phb {
>  	struct pci_controller	*hose;
>  	enum pnv_phb_type	type;
>  	enum pnv_phb_model	model;
>  	u64			hub_id;
>  	u64			opal_id;
> +	int			flags;
>  	void __iomem		*regs;
>  	int			initialized;
>  	spinlock_t		lock;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_EEH
>  	struct pnv_eeh_ops	*eeh_ops;
> -	int			eeh_state;
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-21 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-21 11:53 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/eeh: Remove EEH_PE_PHB_DEAD Gavin Shan
2014-02-21 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/powernv: Remove PNV_EEH_STATE_REMOVED Gavin Shan
2014-02-21 11:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/powernv: Cleanup on PNV_EEH_STATE_ENABLED Gavin Shan
2014-02-21 19:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2014-02-23  2:12     ` Gavin Shan
2014-02-21 11:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/powernv: Cache PHB diag-data Gavin Shan
2014-02-21 20:01   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-23  4:52     ` Gavin Shan
2014-02-21 11:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/powernv: Make PHB diag-data output short Gavin Shan
2014-02-21 20:05   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-23  4:55     ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1393012609.6771.90.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.