From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1393264107.2696.17.camel@rubik> From: Tim Waugh Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:48:27 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1393263259.2696.12.camel@rubik> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Zxnr3+GfbKy0bRk5COVu" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] CUPS 'marker-low-levels' attribute question List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Sweet Cc: "printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org" --=-Zxnr3+GfbKy0bRk5COVu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 12:37 -0500, Michael Sweet wrote: > The intent is that marker-low-levels is the point at which you report > marker-supply-low-warning and marker-high-levels is the point at which > you report marker-waste-almost-full-warning. >=20 > Put more simply, if the marker-levels value is outside the range > reported by marker-low-levels and marker-high-levels, then you need to > do (replace) something soon. Thanks, I see now. Tim. */ --=-Zxnr3+GfbKy0bRk5COVu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAUwuF63lVEo2joavTAQLqzAgAhlM0P4j5dXOJO2FOBIo2XyxftmZ7pk0G BvcjhQju1j+m0sZ5Ecl2ngeCS4tERyEG7OLGUNYK9ilhWEFsjYzPcYfDb/AV5LVc ZLy8jzeMKHD+a/lrK/nemFQLyIM8AGTuZNLUAGNkiNwvuJh/wnmbnVe55Ux6SzzU rhvUO5GHoJGJygOMJxNdWti2Iq3URbA70YdUkKpguE7pAhcp95G29aPYiPROo8Bj c9GHGe8IvBqTuGIHGVrIrYBxFNK6jlt66yqx2TIF5O8exX2vqG0rQ/0I8pqJDSJ5 ZfMXvK7xMv/PKns8pvwuqeQgz/aGqsVgWGG3ELuSWrZq9n8ZXE51tw== =U1fc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Zxnr3+GfbKy0bRk5COVu--