From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bytesatwork.ch (bytesatwork.ch [91.135.72.15]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5566D60DFA for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.20] (8-89.61-188.cust.bluewin.ch [188.61.89.8]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: urs) by bytesatwork.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3302CC18E06 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:15:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1393417433.12829.17.camel@mars.bytesatwork.ch> From: Urs =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4ssler?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:23:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1392780156-11122-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1392882657.29514.3.camel@mars.bytesatwork.ch> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5-2+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-qt5][PATCH] qmake5_base.bbclass: Use Qt version specific paths X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:23:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Am Donnerstag, den 20.02.2014, 08:57 -0300 schrieb Otavio Salvador: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Urs Fässler wrote: > > On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 16:11 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Otavio Salvador > >> wrote: > >> > When looking for Qt5 components and files we ought to use the Qt5 > >> > specific path. In case the distribution wants to have a flat tree it > >> > can set QT_DIR_NAME and it will still works as expected. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > >> > --- > >> > I have built two image and the SDK from scratch using this with no > >> > issues. Could someone also give this a try? > >> > >> Today I rebuilt 5.2.1 image and SDK in two build machines (one Debian > >> Sid and another Debian 7.4 based) and both succeed. > >> > >> Did someone try this one? > >> > > > > I successfully built Qt 5.2.1 (from the 5.2.1 repository, not the above > > patch) for ARM on Debian 7.4. I had some problems with cmake stuff, but > > not sure if this has to do with my configuration. > > It may be related, can you elaborate so I can confirm at my side? Do > you have a test recipe for me to try? > It was my fault, since I use Yocto 1.5 I did not had the current cmake version. It now works. -- bytes at work Konradstrasse 15 CH-8400 Winterthur Switzerland phone: +41 52 213 79 79 fax: +41 52 203 27 13