From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880866D305 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s2CDEKSj014027; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:14:20 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id arcyI7wX8jYy; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:14:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s2CDE923014022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:14:13 GMT Message-ID: <1394630043.19455.62.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Zhu Yanjun Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:14:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1394617589-29064-1-git-send-email-yanjun.zhu@windriver.com> References: <1394617589-29064-1-git-send-email-yanjun.zhu@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libparted: make sure not to treat percentages as exact X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:14:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 17:46 +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > --- > ...ke-sure-not-to-treat-percentages-as-exact.patch | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++ > meta/recipes-extended/parted/parted_3.1.bb | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/parted/parted-3.1/parted-libparted-make-sure-not-to-treat-percentages-as-exact.patch There is no long log in the commit message (why is this patch important?) and no Upstream-Status in the patch. Cheers, Richard