All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] small memory leak due to MachineClass rework
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:43:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1395092601.3377.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5327691D.3040906@de.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 22:29 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 17/03/14 22:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 17 March 2014 20:56, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> Turns out that valgrind is right. We simply forget the memory that g_strconcat has allocated.
> >> This fixes the small leak, but I have to cast away the constness of .name.
> >> Any better ideas?
> > 
> > It's how cpu_register() in target-arm/cpu.c does the same thing
> > (though we use void* rather than gpointer as the cast).
> 
> Ok, if you dont have a problem with that approach, I can submit a proper
> patch with signoff.  Any preference regarding void * vs gpointer?
Hi Cristian,

Thank you for catching this! (I also would go with void *)
Marcel

> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> > If you really dislike the const I guess you could use:
> >     char *name = g_strconcat(...);
> >     TypeInfo ti = {
> >           .name = name,
> >           [...]
> >     };
> >     [...]
> >     g_free(name);
> > 
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-17 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-17 20:56 [Qemu-devel] small memory leak due to MachineClass rework Christian Borntraeger
2014-03-17 21:25 ` Peter Maydell
2014-03-17 21:29   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-03-17 21:38     ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-17 21:43     ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2014-03-18 14:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1395092601.3377.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcel.a@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.