From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82C8E002A6 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s2HNLp68003669; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:21:51 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cHH6oTFYR4Yc; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:21:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s2HNLldT003665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:21:48 GMT Message-ID: <1395098501.3808.57.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Otavio Salvador Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:21:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1395048645.3808.24.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale Subject: Re: meta-fsl-arm build failure X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:22:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 20:14 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > I've been running tests on the autobuilder for B != S and there are > some > > issues in the meta-fsl-arm layer: > > > > > http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-fsl-arm/builds/91 > > > > Specifically: > > > > nightly-fsl-arm/build/meta-fsl-arm/recipes-bsp/mxsldr/mxsldr_git.bb > > > nightly-fsl-arm/build/meta-fsl-arm/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-video-imxfb-vivante_3.10.17-1.0.0.bb > > > > both probably need to inherit autotools-brokensep instead of > autotools > > as an untested guess. > > Your guesses were right; I did both and I should push them tomorrow. Thanks :) Cheers, Richard