From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5456FA40 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s2MACXR8009905; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:12:33 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Zi_eUVJGmdh6; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:12:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s2MACT4E009901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:12:32 GMT Message-ID: <1395483143.24232.16.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Olof Johansson Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:12:23 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20140321082723.GC16597@axis.com> References: <1393068245.5181.8.camel@ted> <20140320150345.GB951@axis.com> <1395328459.3808.180.camel@ted> <20140321082723.GC16597@axis.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Peter Kjellerstedt , "bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bitbake: Disable pseudo in runfetchcmd() X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:12:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 09:27 +0100, Olof Johansson wrote: > On 14-03-20 16:14 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > The log helps immensely since it shows its "Failure expanding variable > > do_patch" so its not running do_patch, it is trying to expand the > > variable for some reason when writing the rpm in do_package_write_rpm. > > > > Are you generating some kind of srpm differently from the normal > > usecases? > > No we don't, as far as I know (is there something I should look > for?). If this isn't something we are doing, what makes it a > problem for us is the fetching of kernel sources from git over > ssh with key authentication. Not sure how common that is. Are you using the archiver classes? I'm wondering if http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=2c7d20ce3849aba84e0552f0fc4bde649d96faa9 might resolve the issue. Somehow you're referencing do_patch in the rpm write task and I'd like to figure out how. We should not be hitting the network during anything other than do_fetch... Cheers, Richard