From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:24:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397550301-31883-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397550301-31883-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Currently xfs_db will claim the CRC on a structure is correct if the
buffer is not marked with an error. However, buffers may have been
read without a verifier, and hence have not had their CRCs
validated. in this case, we shoul dreport "unchecked" rather than
"correct". For example:
xfs_db> fsb 0x6003f
xfs_db> type dir3
xfs_db> p
dhdr.hdr.magic = 0x58444433
dhdr.hdr.crc = 0x2d0f9c9d (unchecked)
....
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
db/fprint.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
db/io.c | 2 ++
db/io.h | 12 +++++++++---
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/db/fprint.c b/db/fprint.c
index 435d984..52782e2 100644
--- a/db/fprint.c
+++ b/db/fprint.c
@@ -206,7 +206,20 @@ fp_crc(
__int64_t val;
char *ok;
- ok = iocur_crc_valid() ? "correct" : "bad";
+ switch (iocur_crc_valid()) {
+ case -1:
+ ok = "unchecked";
+ break;
+ case 0:
+ ok = "bad";
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ ok = "correct";
+ break;
+ default:
+ ok = "unknown state";
+ break;
+ }
for (i = 0, bitpos = bit;
i < count && !seenint();
diff --git a/db/io.c b/db/io.c
index 5eb61d9..387f171 100644
--- a/db/io.c
+++ b/db/io.c
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ set_cur(
return;
iocur_top->buf = bp->b_addr;
iocur_top->bp = bp;
+ if (!ops)
+ bp->b_flags |= LIBXFS_B_UNCHECKED;
iocur_top->bb = d;
iocur_top->blen = c;
diff --git a/db/io.h b/db/io.h
index ad39bee..7875119 100644
--- a/db/io.h
+++ b/db/io.h
@@ -63,10 +63,16 @@ extern void set_cur(const struct typ *t, __int64_t d, int c, int ring_add,
bbmap_t *bbmap);
extern void ring_add(void);
-static inline bool
+/*
+ * returns -1 for unchecked, 0 for bad and 1 for good
+ */
+static inline int
iocur_crc_valid()
{
- return (iocur_top->bp &&
- iocur_top->bp->b_error != EFSBADCRC &&
+ if (!iocur_top->bp)
+ return -1;
+ if (iocur_top->bp->b_flags & LIBXFS_B_UNCHECKED)
+ return -1;
+ return (iocur_top->bp->b_error != EFSBADCRC &&
(!iocur_top->ino_buf || iocur_top->ino_crc_ok));
}
--
1.9.0
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-15 8:24 [PATCH 0/9] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 8:24 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-04-21 7:00 ` [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:13 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [PATCH 2/9] db: verify buffer on type change Dave Chinner
2014-04-21 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:14 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [PATCH 3/9] repair: ensure prefetched buffers have CRCs validated Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 19:40 ` Brian Foster
2014-04-15 21:46 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 22:06 ` Brian Foster
2014-04-16 0:41 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [PATCH 4/9] repair: detect and correct CRC errors in directory blocks Dave Chinner
2014-04-21 7:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [PATCH 5/9] repair: detect CRC errors in AG headers Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 19:40 ` Brian Foster
2014-04-15 21:52 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-21 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-22 9:10 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22 9:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [PATCH 6/9] repair: report AG btree verifier errors Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 19:40 ` Brian Foster
2014-04-15 21:53 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [PATCH 7/9] repair: remove more dirv1 leftovers Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 13:23 ` Brian Foster
2014-04-21 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-15 8:25 ` [PATCH 8/9] repair: handle remote sylmlink CRC errors Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 13:23 ` Brian Foster
2014-04-15 8:25 ` [PATCH 9/9] repair: detect and handle attribute tree " Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 13:25 ` Brian Foster
2014-04-21 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-24 5:01 [PATCH 0/9 V2] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-24 5:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 [PATCH 0/9 v3] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397550301-31883-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.