From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/mfn-dump: Fixes to 'dump-p2m' Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:35:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1398810917.16933.34.camel@Solace> References: <1398373587-26948-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1398785123.16933.16.camel@Solace> <535FD5B5.30208@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6742064527424781219==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <535FD5B5.30208@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6742064527424781219== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-DhXSU1HmnAJgR/Nje7Kd" --=-DhXSU1HmnAJgR/Nje7Kd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-04-29 at 17:39 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > The top bit of the type has nothing to do with mappings, or certainly > nothing that I am aware of, having successfully rewritten PV migration > from scratch. >=20 > The guest can still have mappings to its pinned pagetables, which > would have the top bit of the type set. >=20 > In xc_domain_save.c, this macro is used 4 times. 3 are used on mfns > and 1 is used on a type (for a bit of debugging code which appears > dead anyway). I expect noone has every tried migrating a PV domain > whose pages are located in mfns with the 44th bit set. >=20 Right. The fact that such macro is present in xc_domain_save.c was the exact region why I was asking. :-) > So by bogus, I mean the macro itself, and all uses of it. >=20 > My best guess is that is some vestigial code left over from a previous > way of doing things, although I didn't encounter anything related to > this in code archaeology I performed when trying to work out why the > legacy migration did certain things the way they did. >=20 I see. Makes sense, thanks for clearing my doubts. :-) Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-DhXSU1HmnAJgR/Nje7Kd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlNgKSYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQVEwCgqr9uw/pvngdg4znX/KgXsEIx +qoAn2BrNgAiYMT9FM6NgiSx1Gx+Dtq1 =0Ad2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DhXSU1HmnAJgR/Nje7Kd-- --===============6742064527424781219== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============6742064527424781219==--