From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (unknown [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D530C60897; Thu, 8 May 2014 22:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s48M6MR9006811; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:23 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AKsFxjNx7hlI; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s48M6I9F006806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1399586771.31891.76.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Paul Eggleton Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:06:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2287383.nOAQ2ykZqg@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <4880759.hcBN3hRDv1@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <20140508161908.GQ30955@jama> <2287383.nOAQ2ykZqg@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , OE-devel , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [yocto] GStreamer 0.10's future X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:06:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 17:57 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Yes, I'm just talking about libav 0.8 here - libav 9 would remain where it is. > That might still be problematic though given that their PN is the same. I'm > open to better suggestions, but I think we have to do *something* here. We could put a PROVIDES += "xxx" into one of the libavs and then DEPENDS on that in the corresponding recipes... Cheers, Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (unknown [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D530C60897; Thu, 8 May 2014 22:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s48M6MR9006811; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:23 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AKsFxjNx7hlI; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s48M6I9F006806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1399586771.31891.76.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Paul Eggleton Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:06:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2287383.nOAQ2ykZqg@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <4880759.hcBN3hRDv1@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <20140508161908.GQ30955@jama> <2287383.nOAQ2ykZqg@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , OE-devel , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [yocto] GStreamer 0.10's future X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:06:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 17:57 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Yes, I'm just talking about libav 0.8 here - libav 9 would remain where it is. > That might still be problematic though given that their PN is the same. I'm > open to better suggestions, but I think we have to do *something* here. We could put a PROVIDES += "xxx" into one of the libavs and then DEPENDS on that in the corresponding recipes... Cheers, Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E32F1E00B62; Thu, 8 May 2014 15:06:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Received: from dan.rpsys.net (unknown [87.81.244.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71078E00B47 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 15:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s48M6MR9006811; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:23 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AKsFxjNx7hlI; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s48M6I9F006806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 8 May 2014 23:06:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1399586771.31891.76.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Paul Eggleton Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:06:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2287383.nOAQ2ykZqg@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <4880759.hcBN3hRDv1@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <20140508161908.GQ30955@jama> <2287383.nOAQ2ykZqg@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , OE-devel , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:06:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 17:57 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Yes, I'm just talking about libav 0.8 here - libav 9 would remain where it is. > That might still be problematic though given that their PN is the same. I'm > open to better suggestions, but I think we have to do *something* here. We could put a PROVIDES += "xxx" into one of the libavs and then DEPENDS on that in the corresponding recipes... Cheers, Richard