From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAF8C433EF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 02:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237323AbiFJC1G (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 22:27:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40968 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230148AbiFJC1F (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 22:27:05 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D779CC142 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 19:27:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654828024; x=1686364024; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0YhopTnCL2tDWKi7DIPRXg+goFOsnmlIgLYpLyJ3v+c=; b=kQezF4c7C4mU1wjc0f9QzUhukSvpGnnHsudDDpmq4n7W19ibfXihO/yu Rfd7DgbiILbx7BkEh2yGuNwHvpqQn8boAYR5VJ8EhAVK7FKbR+Qtz2smE 1tArGdjG20FkUQNCUtrWVH5xogdd8wUbnEeT963gEkchLbO28vNYU6VCj uxx3af9urRGMOvCJOfcFQDQmDShfIgiBNyzID4STudjrYiXt3LZkm9StC Js55WqzUZEoSoR/nG/dTE9z9XqcOHdyywvz3GGu1m3Zkc6wJzN0zmkkqc rn3vruNV/DEFEQFGWWG14ilDD5Vo/A5FdWlLtxgtuAitZQVUOh9f1GPZs A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10373"; a="275013018" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,288,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="275013018" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2022 19:27:03 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,288,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="671618576" Received: from xueqianz-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.249.172.254]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2022 19:27:02 -0700 Message-ID: <13a8ee34a67ec8a59e926c91894365e8d512d260.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap: intel_rapl: Add support for RAPTORLAKE_P From: Zhang Rui To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Srinivas Pandruvada Cc: Linux PM , George D Sworo Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:26:58 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20220601192216.9174-1-george.d.sworo@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 20:55 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Rui, Srinivas, should I take this one? Sorry that I missed this one. George, Have this patch been tested yet? I have the same patch internally, it should work but I haven't got chance to test it yet. thanks, rui > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 9:22 PM wrote: > > > > From: George D Sworo > > > > Add RAPTORLAKE_P to the list of supported processor model in the > > Intel > > > > RAPL power capping driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: George D Sworo > > --- > > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c > > b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c > > index a9c99d9e8b42..21d624f9f5fb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c > > @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_ids[] > > __initconst = { > > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_L, &rapl_defau > > lts_core), > > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &rapl_defau > > lts_core), > > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &rapl_defau > > lts_core), > > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &rapl_defau > > lts_core), > > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(SAPPHIRERAPIDS_X, &rapl_defau > > lts_spr_server), > > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(LAKEFIELD, &rapl_defau > > lts_core), > > > > -- > > 2.17.1 > >