From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: don't try to balance rt_runtime when it is futile
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 10:36:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400402201.5166.13.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140518052039.GF4570@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 22:20 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> If you are saying that turning on nohz_full doesn't help unless you
> also ensure that there is only one runnable task per CPU, I completely
> agree. If you are saying something else, you lost me. ;-)
Yup, that's it more or less. It's not only single task loads that could
benefit from better isolation, but if isolation improving measures are
tied to nohz_full, other sensitive loads will suffer if they try to use
isolation improvements.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-18 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-14 15:08 [PATCH] sched/rt: don't try to balance rt_runtime when it is futile Paul Gortmaker
2014-05-14 15:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-14 19:11 ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-05-14 19:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-15 2:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-15 14:09 ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-11-27 9:17 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-27 15:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-11-27 11:36 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-05-15 3:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-15 14:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-15 17:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-18 4:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-18 5:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-18 8:36 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2014-05-18 15:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-19 2:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-19 5:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-20 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-20 15:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-20 16:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-20 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-20 17:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-21 4:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-21 4:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-21 12:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-21 3:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-19 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-19 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 19:40 ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-11-27 11:21 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400402201.5166.13.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.