All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Reducing size of the weekly build
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:30:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400704210.17834.9.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0La6PT=gUpvp+Fsh1QpOx1H147HgiVT4nmCrKvLFRroiEA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 19:58 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 17:22, Flanagan, Elizabeth <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> wrote:
> > One thing I'm thinking of and I want some feedback here is setting the
> > package type on the main builds to just ipk and running a special
> > deb/rpm test being to ensure those package types are functional. This
> > should give us a bit of a speed increase for build times, without
> > introducing too much risk. Thoughts?
> 
> The reduced coverage is something to consider, but if the other builds
> were world and also built images then the reduction shouldn't be too
> bad.  I wonder what the speed difference between ipk and ipkg+rpm is:
> this is probably worth measuring.

We do need to be careful about coverage here. We have seen bugs where
things failed in deb or rpm but not ipk and maybe only on some
architectures.

I'm fine with being more selective about what we publish however in the
builds it may be worth leaving this enabled.

Cheers,

Richard



  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-21 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-21 16:22 Reducing size of the weekly build Flanagan, Elizabeth
2014-05-21 18:58 ` Burton, Ross
2014-05-21 20:30   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2014-05-21 20:40     ` Flanagan, Elizabeth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1400704210.17834.9.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
    --cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.