[U-Boot] Building under Cygwin - "-ansi" flag?

[Jeroen Hofstee <dasuboot@myspectrum.nl>]

Hello Vasili,

On wo, 2014-05-21 at 11:50 +0300, Vasili Galka wrote:

> >>    This pattern is a
> >>    result of the original decision from 2004 to prioritize the host
> >>    include paths over the paths from U-Boot tree.
> >
> > any reference?
> 
> This decision is a part of the above mentioned commit: e1a3f6b (July 2004)
> I don't know how much the original committer was aware of its long
> term implications.

If the only valid reason is "Fix host tools building in Cygwin
environment" as mentioned in the original commit, then I am all in favor
of dropping it and finding a decent solution for cygwin.

> >> I see this happening
> >>    again and again with different headers in the future. So here comes
> >>    the question, is it really the right thing prioritize the include
> >>    paths this way? Why do host paths MUST come first?
> >>    I'll try reverting this locally and looking what breaks and what
> >>    alternative solutions exist.
> >
> > I have no idea why it is the way it is, but keep in mind that e.g. stdio
> > headers in u-boot is quite something different then stdio for the target
> > userland.
> 
> Sure. I'll keep it in mind while I'm designing a solution here. I'm
> afraid there is no easy way to fix it though.
> 
This is easier than it sounds. U-boot is build with -nostdinc for the
binary itself. And it tries to get the compiler related includes back
with "isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include". (and the printf
declaration and friends are actually in common.h for the loader, which
makes it even harder to do it wrong by accident).

Can you check what "arm-none-eabi-gcc -print-file-name=include" returns
on cygwin?

mmm, this one might be also be a challenge for cygwin: 
"dirname `arm-none-eabi-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name`", but you will
likely get linker errors if that contains spaces / backslashes or simply
fails.

But perhaps even easier, can you post the problems you encounter if you
remove the idirafter. Likely easier then guessing what can go wrong in a
cygwin build.

Regards,
Jeroen