From: Liu Ping Fan <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@adaptec.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC 1/9] block: make timeout_list protectd by REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE bit
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:15:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1401437747-2097-2-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401437747-2097-1-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The "request->timeout_list" is under the risk of modified by both timeout
(abort handler) and a "finishing" handler. Using bit REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE in
atomic_flags as a guard to shield this issue.
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
block/blk-timeout.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-timeout.c b/block/blk-timeout.c
index 7a882f7..d3067f0 100644
--- a/block/blk-timeout.c
+++ b/block/blk-timeout.c
@@ -120,13 +120,14 @@ void blk_rq_check_expired(struct request *rq, unsigned long *next_timeout,
unsigned int *next_set)
{
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->deadline)) {
- list_del_init(&rq->timeout_list);
/*
* Check if we raced with end io completion
*/
- if (!blk_mark_rq_complete(rq))
+ if (!blk_mark_rq_complete(rq)) {
+ list_del_init(&rq->timeout_list);
blk_rq_timed_out(rq);
+ }
} else if (!*next_set || time_after(*next_timeout, rq->deadline)) {
*next_timeout = rq->deadline;
*next_set = 1;
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-30 8:15 [RFC 0/9] fix for the race issue between scsi timer and in-flight scmd Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` Liu Ping Fan [this message]
2014-05-30 8:15 ` [RFC 2/9] scsi: ensure request is dequeue when finishing scmd Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` [RFC 3/9] scsi: introduce new internal flag SUCCESS_REMOVE Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` [RFC 4/9] blk: change the prototype of blk_complete_request() Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` [RFC 6/9] blk: split the reclaim of req from blk_finish_request() Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` [RFC 7/9] scsi: adopt ref on scsi_cmnd to avoid a race on request Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` [RFC 8/9] scsi: virtscsi: work around to abort a scmd Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:15 ` [RFC 9/9] scsi: ibmvscsi: return SUCCESS_REMOVE when finding a abort cmd Liu Ping Fan
2014-05-30 8:26 ` [RFC 0/9] fix for the race issue between scsi timer and in-flight scmd Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-30 8:31 ` liu ping fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1401437747-2097-2-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=aacraid@adaptec.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.