From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de, mhocko@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: avoid scanning the whole targets[*] when scan_balance equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 21:47:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402062463.15497.7.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140606131251.GB2878@cmpxchg.org>
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:12 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 04:54:26PM +0800, Chen Yucong wrote:
> > If (scan_balance == SCAN_FILE) is true for shrink_lruvec, then the value of
> > targets[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] and targets[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] will be zero. As a result,
> > the value of 'percentage' will also be zero, and the *whole* targets[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]
> > and targets[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] will be scanned.
> >
> > For (scan_balance == SCAN_ANON), there is the same conditions stated above.
> >
> > But via https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/10/334, we can find that the kernel does not prefer
> > reclaiming too many pages from the other LRU. So before recalculating the other LRU scan
> > count based on its original scan targets and the percentage scanning already complete, we
> > should need to check whether 'scan_balance' equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index d51f7e0..ca3f5f1 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2120,6 +2120,9 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> > percentage = nr_file * 100 / scan_target;
> > }
> >
> > + if (targets[lru] == 0 && targets[lru + LRU_ACTIVE] == 0)
> > + break;
>
> We have meanwhile included a change that bails out if nr_anon or
> nr_file are zero, right before that percentage calculation, that
> should cover the scenario you're describing. It's called:
>
> mm: vmscan: use proportional scanning during direct reclaim and full scan at DEF_PRIORITY
Thanks very much for your reply. Indeed, your patch is more
comprehensive and perfect. I think I need to update my local
git-repository timely.
thx!
cyc
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 8:54 [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: avoid scanning the whole targets[*] when scan_balance equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON Chen Yucong
2014-06-06 13:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-06 13:47 ` Chen Yucong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402062463.15497.7.camel@debian \
--to=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.