From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
juri.lelli@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, raistlin@linux.it,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch "sched/deadline: Change sched_getparam() behaviour vs SCHED_DEADLINE" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:14:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14023412812007@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
sched/deadline: Change sched_getparam() behaviour vs SCHED_DEADLINE
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
sched-deadline-change-sched_getparam-behaviour-vs-sched_deadline.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ce5f7f8200ca2504f6f290044393d73ca314965a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 22:50:34 +0200
Subject: sched/deadline: Change sched_getparam() behaviour vs SCHED_DEADLINE
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
commit ce5f7f8200ca2504f6f290044393d73ca314965a upstream.
The way we read POSIX one should only call sched_getparam() when
sched_getscheduler() returns either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.
Given that we currently return sched_param::sched_priority=0 for all
others, extend the same behaviour to SCHED_DEADLINE.
Requested-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140512205034.GH13467@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(sched_getscheduler, pid_
*/
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_getparam, pid_t, pid, struct sched_param __user *, param)
{
- struct sched_param lp;
+ struct sched_param lp = { .sched_priority = 0 };
struct task_struct *p;
int retval;
@@ -3752,11 +3752,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_getparam, pid_t, p
if (retval)
goto out_unlock;
- if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
- retval = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- lp.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
+ if (task_has_rt_policy(p))
+ lp.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peterz@infradead.org are
queue-3.14/sched-deadline-fix-memory-leak.patch
queue-3.14/sched-use-cpupri_nr_priorities-instead-of-max_rt_prio-in-cpupri-check.patch
queue-3.14/perf-prevent-false-warning-in-perf_swevent_add.patch
queue-3.14/sched-dl-fix-race-in-dl_task_timer.patch
queue-3.14/perf-fix-race-in-removing-an-event.patch
queue-3.14/sched-fix-hotplug-vs.-set_cpus_allowed_ptr.patch
queue-3.14/sched-deadline-restrict-user-params-max-value-to-2-63-ns.patch
queue-3.14/sched-make-sched_setattr-correctly-return-efbig.patch
queue-3.14/perf-limit-perf_event_attr-sample_period-to-63-bits.patch
queue-3.14/sched-disallow-sched_attr-sched_policy-0.patch
queue-3.14/sched-deadline-change-sched_getparam-behaviour-vs-sched_deadline.patch
queue-3.14/sched-sanitize-irq-accounting-madness.patch
reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14023412812007@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.