All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] hw/pcie: better hotplug/hotunplug support
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:54:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403434446.2109.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140619144358.GB10359@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 17:43 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 04:52:21PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > Hotplug triggers both 'present detect change' and
> > 'attention button pressed'.
> > 
> > Hotunplug starts by triggering 'attention button pressed',
> > then waits for the OS to power off the device and only
> > then detaches it.
> > 
> 
> Pls not here that current code is broken: it does surprise removal which
> crashes guests.
I'll add a note, sure.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/pci/pcie.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > index f8bf515..9cfd93d 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > @@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> >  
> >      pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
> >                                 PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS);
> > -    pcie_cap_slot_event(PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_dev), PCI_EXP_HP_EV_PDC);
> > +    pcie_cap_slot_event(PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_dev),
> > +                        PCI_EXP_HP_EV_PDC | PCI_EXP_HP_EV_ABP);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void pcie_cap_slot_hot_unplug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> > @@ -268,10 +269,7 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_hot_unplug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> >  
> >      pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_dev), dev, &exp_cap, errp);
> >  
> > -    object_unparent(OBJECT(dev));
> > -    pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
> > -                                 PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS);
> > -    pcie_cap_slot_event(PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_dev), PCI_EXP_HP_EV_PDC);
> > +    pcie_cap_slot_push_attention_button(PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_dev));
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* pci express slot for pci express root/downstream port
> > @@ -389,6 +387,18 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_write_config(PCIDevice *dev,
> >                          sltsta);
> >      }
> >  
> 
> pls add code comments explaining the logic here.
I thought is clear :(
Basically: If the device is present, power indicator off and power
controller off, it is safe to detach the device.
> 
> > +    if ((sltsta & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS) && (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC) &&
> > +        ((val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF) == PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF)) {
> > +        PCIDevice *slot_dev = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev))->devices[0];
> > +        if (slot_dev) {
> 
> Here you want to remove all devices behind the bridge?
Yes, but since it is PCIe we only have one device,
but we may have a multi-function device...

> You need to do this for all functions, not just function 0.
So bus devices are actually functions... OK, I'll run a loop here.

> 
> > +            object_unparent(OBJECT(slot_dev));
> > +            pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
> > +                                         PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS);
> > +            pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
> > +                                       PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC);
> 
> These bits need to be cleared in any case?
No, "PDS on" means the devices is present, so we clear it only after the
OS  powers it off.

> 
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +
> >      hotplug_event_notify(dev);
> >  
> >      /* 
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-22 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-19 13:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] hw/pcie: better hotplug/hotunplug support Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 13:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] hw/pcie: corrected a debug message Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 13:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] hw/pcie: implement power controller functionality Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 14:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-19 20:56     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-22 10:47     ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-22 10:52       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:11         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:17           ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 13:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] hw/pcie: better hotplug/hotunplug support Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 14:43   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 10:54     ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2014-06-22 11:03       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:11         ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-22 11:12           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:24             ` Marcel Apfelbaum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1403434446.2109.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcel.a@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.