All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [regression, 3.16-rc] rwsem: optimistic spinning causing performance degradation
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:14:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404530065.2572.8.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404463996.2457.10.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>

On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 01:53 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 00:06 -0700, Jason Low 
> > Subject: [PATCH] rwsem: In rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(), return false if no owner
> 
> Could we change the subject to something more descriptive, ie:
> 
> rwsem: Allow conservative optimistic spinning for reader/writer paths

Sure, a Subject like this would better explain what is the effect of the
patch.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-05  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1404413420.8764.42.camel@j-VirtualBox>
     [not found] ` <1404416236.3179.18.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
2014-07-03 20:08   ` [regression, 3.16-rc] rwsem: optimistic spinning causing performance degradation Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-04  1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-04  1:46   ` Jason Low
2014-07-04  1:54     ` Jason Low
2014-07-04  6:13       ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-04  7:06         ` Jason Low
2014-07-04  8:21           ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-04  8:53           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-05  3:14             ` Jason Low [this message]
2014-07-04  7:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-04  8:40         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-05  3:49           ` Jason Low
     [not found]             ` <CAAW_DMjgd5+EOvZX7_iZe-jHp=00Nf7MX3z6hBCRPgOfqnMtEA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-07-14  9:55               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 17:10                 ` Jason Low
2014-07-15  2:17                 ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-16 19:20             ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/rwsem: Allow conservative optimistic spinning when readers have lock tip-bot for Jason Low
2014-07-03  2:32 [regression, 3.16-rc] rwsem: optimistic spinning causing performance degradation Dave Chinner
2014-07-03  3:31 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-03  4:59   ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-03  5:39     ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-03  7:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-03  7:56         ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1404530065.2572.8.camel@j-VirtualBox \
    --to=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.